Use of www.preemptionwatch.org

The Preemption | Watch Web site is intended to support the organization’s mission related to the advancement of public health through law. Documents, search results, or information in any other form (collectively referred to herein as “information”) that are found on Preemption | Watch’s Web site are provided by a diverse range of sources. Preemption | Watch makes no warranties or representations, either expressed or implied, about the Web site or its content or about the accuracy or currency of any information on Preemption | Watch’s Web site. Preemption | Watch further disclaims any and all liability whatsoever in any information, material, or content of any external Web site or web pages that may be accessed through or linked to Preemption | Watch’s Web site. Users are hereby notified that by accessing and using this Web site the user assumes the risk that information and content contained on the Web site may be offensive, inaccurate, out-of-date, incomplete, and/or may not meet the needs and requirements of the user. Any reference on this Web site to any specific commercial product, service, manufacturer, or company does not constitute its endorsement or recommendation by Preemption | Watch or its employees or agents. All Web site information is subject to change without prior notice. Preemption | Watch makes no warranties or representations concerning the availability or functionality of information contained on its Web servers or that this Web site will be uninterrupted and error-free. None of the material, information or content on this Web site shall serve as or create a contract between Preemption | Watch and any person or entity accessing and using the Web site.

By using Preemption | Watch’s Web site, each user agrees to abide by the copyright laws of the United States and all other applicable federal and state laws. Users may incur personal liability for any copyright violations resulting from the user’s failure or refusal to abide by the terms of this disclaimer. Comments involving information perceived as inaccurate, misleading, or inappropriate should be directed to the Web site author, if known, and mark@preemptionwatch.org.

Blog

  • Risk of Preemption in the Smoke-Free Housing Movement

    Over the last few years, the movement to promote smoke-free policies for multi-unit housing has been extremely successful.  Thousands of privately own apartment buildings have voluntarily implemented policies prohibiting or significantly restricting smoking in common areas, individual units, on patios and balconies and on the entire property.  Public housing authorities…

  • IOM Takes the Lead on Local Public Health and Preemption

    The Institute of Medicine has addressed federal and state preemption in a new report on law and policy in public health. Among the most authoritative, and unbiased, voices in public health, the IOM has concluded that federal and state preemption should be avoided “unless there are compelling reasons to the…

  • Preempting a movement for childhood obesity prevention

    Taking a well-worn page from the playbook of the Tobacco Industry, the fast food industry is quietly, and so far successfully, eliminating local control over nutrition policy. In March, the Arizona legislature passed a preemption bill written by the Arizona Restaurant Association.  The new law, which goes into effect in July, takes away the authority…

  • Preemption threatens grassroots fire prevention movement

    About 3000 Americans die in home fires every year and thousands more are injured. Home fires are the greatest cause of fire deaths and injuries, and children under five and older adults face the highest risk. One of the great public health success stories of the past decade is the grassroots movement for…

  • Preemption should be the exception, not the rule

    There’s been bad news on the federal preemption front recently, but there’s some good news, too. Last month, the Administrative Conference of the United States published a Recommendation for the first time in fifteen years—about preemption in federal rulemaking. The Recommendation explains a Clinton-era Executive Order (that builds upon a…

News

  • Regulating Guns in New Orleans: An Op-Ed

    Louisiana is one of 42 states…that prohibits any political subdivision from passing an ordinance or regulation concerning the sale, purchase, or ownership of guns that’s more restrictive than state law.

  • Cleveland files in court to keep its ban on trans fats

    Jackson was joined…by council members Phyllis Cleveland and Joe Cimperman… Cleveland, council majority leader, noted that she had voted against the trans fat ban last year…
    “But I stand here in support of our mayor and our partners,” she said… We see our city power being attacked by Columbus… [O]ur right to govern ourselves is being eroded.”

  • IOM Report: Revitalizing Law and Policy

    “[U]nless there are compelling reasons to the contrary, the federal government ought not preempt state and local authority in advancing the public’s health.”

  • Governor blocks limits on sprinkler rules

    By TOM FAHEY State House Bureau Chief CONCORD — A second legislative attempt to block local fire and planning officials from setting rules on residential…

  • Local Laws Fighting Fat Under Siege

    NY Times, June 30, 2011 By STEPHANIE STROM Several state legislatures are passing laws that prohibit municipalities and other local governments from adopting regulations aimed at…

Resources

› Fact sheet

› Glossary

› Links

› Preemption Framework

› IOM Presentation