Ceiling preemption

Prohibits lower levels of government from adopting stronger health protections than what the higher level law requires.  It is this type of preemption that is most commonly meant when preemption is discussed, and is the form of preemption that causes concern for supporters of public health.  Ceiling preemption can prohibit a lower level government from passing any kind of law regulating a particular topic, even in the absence of meaningful state or federal regulation.

Express preemption

Express preemption occurs when a statute or regulation contains explicit language preempting stronger laws adopted by a lower jurisdiction.  Express preemption usually takes the form of a “preemption clause.”  Preemptive language comes in many forms – in addition to preempt, look for words or phrases like uniform, supersede, sole authority, occupy the field, do not exceed, shall be consistent with, and exclusive authority.

Floor preemption

A type of preemption that is generally not controversial, “floor preemption” is arguably not preemption at all.  Floor preemption refers to the fact that when higher levels of government pass laws that establish minimum requirements or standards, lower jurisdictions cannot “opt out” (unless they are specifically given that power by the higher level of government).

Grassroots health movement

A collective effort to prevent disease or other threats to health and safety, comprised of activated citizens and organizations that support them.

Implied preemption

Implied preemption occurs when a court finds that a law is preemptive even in the absence of express preemption.  Courts find implied preemption by considering the context of a given law.   Implied preemption can be avoided by including a well drafted non-preemption, or “savings,” clause in public health legislation or regulations.

Law

A local, state or national system of formal rules governing the conduct of individuals and businesses, in response to the need for regularity, consistency and justice.  The term “law” includes statutes adopted by a legislative body, regulations adopted by a government agency, and court decisions.

Preemption

The extent to which federal law trumps state and local authority (or state law trumps local authority).  Preemption occurs when, by legislative or regulatory action, a higher level of government (state or federal) eliminates or reduces the authority of a lower level over a given issue.

Preemption clause

Explicit language in a statute, regulation or other law that expresses the intention to eliminate or limit the authority of lower levels of government over a given subject matter.

Public health

Community action to avoid disease and other threats to the health and welfare of individuals and the community at large.

Regulation

An agency statement of general applicability that implements or interprets a statute or other law, adds detail, or creates a procedure.  Regulations are normally adopted through a formal rulemaking process that allows for oversight and public input.

Rulemaking

The process by which formal rules or regulations are considered and adopted.  A government agency may adopt regulations only to the extent that the legislature has given it the authority to do so, and rulemaking authority is limited by the scope of the delegation.

Statute

A written law adopted by the act of a legislative body.  Statutes are enacted to proscribe conduct, define crimes, create lower units of government, delegate rulemaking authority, delegate or take away authority from lower units of government, and in general promote the public good.

Savings clause

Also known as a non-preemption clause, a savings clause states that a federal statute or regulation does not preempt stronger state and local laws (or in the case of a state law, does not preempt stronger local laws.)   For example, a federal law might state: “Nothing in this law preempts more restrictive state or local regulation or requirements.”  Inclusion of a well drafted savings clause is the only way to ensure that a federal or state law will not preempt stronger state or local laws.

Supremacy Clause

Article VI, Clause 2 of the US Constitution provides that federal laws “shall be the supreme Law of the Land.”  Among other things, this means that Congress and federal regulators have virtually unlimited authority – if they choose to exercise it – to preempt state and local health laws.

Blog

  • Risk of Preemption in the Smoke-Free Housing Movement

    Over the last few years, the movement to promote smoke-free policies for multi-unit housing has been extremely successful.  Thousands of privately own apartment buildings have voluntarily implemented policies prohibiting or significantly restricting smoking in common areas, individual units, on patios and balconies and on the entire property.  Public housing authorities…

  • IOM Takes the Lead on Preemption

    The Institute of Medicine has addressed federal and state preemption in a new report on law and policy in public health. Among the most authoritative, and unbiased, voices in public health, the IOM has concluded that federal and state preemption should be avoided “unless there are compelling reasons to the…

  • Preempting a movement for childhood obesity prevention

    Taking a well-worn page from the playbook of the Tobacco Industry, the fast food industry is quietly, and so far successfully, eliminating local control over nutrition policy. In March, the Arizona legislature passed a preemption bill written by the Arizona Restaurant Association.  The new law, which goes into effect in July, takes away the authority…

  • Preemption threatens grassroots fire prevention movement

    About 3000 Americans die in home fires every year and thousands more are injured. Home fires are the greatest cause of fire deaths and injuries, and children under five and older adults face the highest risk. One of the great public health success stories of the past decade is the grassroots movement for…

  • Preemption should be the exception, not the rule

    There’s been bad news on the federal preemption front recently, but there’s some good news, too. Last month, the Administrative Conference of the United States published a Recommendation for the first time in fifteen years—about preemption in federal rulemaking. The Recommendation explains a Clinton-era Executive Order (that builds upon a…

News

  • Regulating Guns in New Orleans: An Op-Ed

    Louisiana is one of 42 states…that prohibits any political subdivision from passing an ordinance or regulation concerning the sale, purchase, or ownership of guns that’s more restrictive than state law.

  • Cleveland files in court to keep its ban on trans fats

    Jackson was joined…by council members Phyllis Cleveland and Joe Cimperman… Cleveland, council majority leader, noted that she had voted against the trans fat ban last year…
    “But I stand here in support of our mayor and our partners,” she said… We see our city power being attacked by Columbus… [O]ur right to govern ourselves is being eroded.”

  • Environmental Groups Call for Tougher Measures in Marcellus Shale Bills

    While the industry faces a significant challenge in meeting local land use controls, there are critical site or regional considerations that cannot be effectively addressed within a state statute. The state should not grant special preemption for any one industry in this regard.

  • Mayors’ group campaigns against concealed gun bill

    NEW YORK (AP) Monday, September 12, 2011; Seattle Post-Intelligencer Mayor Michael Bloomberg and other mayors in support of gun control are speaking out against a…

  • IOM Report: Revitalizing Law and Policy

    “[U]nless there are compelling reasons to the contrary, the federal government ought not preempt state and local authority in advancing the public’s health.”

Resources

› Fact sheet

› Glossary

› Links

› Preemption Checklist

› Building Movements

› Movement Benefits

› IOM Presentation