Bloggers

Grassroots fire prevention

Friday, November 5, 2010

by Mark Pertschuk

According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), about 3000 Americans die in home fires every year and thousands more are injured. Home fires are by far the greatest cause of fire deaths and injuries. Children under five and older adults face the highest risk. And anyone who has survived a serious fire injury, or knows someone who has, understands the human costs behind the numbers.

For the individuals and families behind the numbers, the costs of fire injury are incalculable. As one survivor reports on the NFPA website: “For me, the burns I suffered in a home fire led to not only physical impacts, but also the loss of a marriage, and the loss of a career I loved.”

But there’s good news: We know how to prevent home fires: Residential fire sprinklers.  Similar to the systems required in hotels and apartment buildings for decades, home fire sprinklers cut the risk of death by 80% and the cost of property damage by 71%. If you think that spending a few bucks per sq. foot to install fire sprinklers is too expensive, check out the NFPA’s new Faces of Fire campaign and reconsider.

In a grassroots victory reminiscent of the tobacco movement, fire prevention advocates have passed more than 300 local ordinances across the US requiring residential sprinklers in new single- and two-family homes.  It’s an example of grassroots democracy at its finest, but building industry lobbyists in the state capitols have taken a page from the tobacco industry to undermine these life saving local laws.  So far, 12 states have passed “anti-fire sprinkler” laws that preempt these local safety requirements.

The successful grassroots fire prevention movement is fighting preemption while winning impressive statewide victories in California and elsewhere.  The campaign is supported by the Home Safety Council, NFPA, Common Voices, the Phoenix Society for Burn Survivors, fire chiefs, and other members of the fire service.  It’s also a great example of the Winnable Battles that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention believes are so important to continued progress in public health, and an opportunity for the public health community to partner with safety advocates, burn survivors, and the fire service.

1 Comment to Grassroots fire prevention

[...] an update of an earlier post on residential fire [...]

Leave a comment

Blog

  • Risk of Preemption in the Smoke-Free Housing Movement

    Over the last few years, the movement to promote smoke-free policies for multi-unit housing has been extremely successful.  Thousands of privately own apartment buildings have voluntarily implemented policies prohibiting or significantly restricting smoking in common areas, individual units, on patios and balconies and on the entire property.  Public housing authorities…

  • IOM Takes the Lead on Preemption

    The Institute of Medicine has addressed federal and state preemption in a new report on law and policy in public health. Among the most authoritative, and unbiased, voices in public health, the IOM has concluded that federal and state preemption should be avoided “unless there are compelling reasons to the…

  • Preempting a movement for childhood obesity prevention

    Taking a well-worn page from the playbook of the Tobacco Industry, the fast food industry is quietly, and so far successfully, eliminating local control over nutrition policy. In March, the Arizona legislature passed a preemption bill written by the Arizona Restaurant Association.  The new law, which goes into effect in July, takes away the authority…

  • Preemption threatens grassroots fire prevention movement

    About 3000 Americans die in home fires every year and thousands more are injured. Home fires are the greatest cause of fire deaths and injuries, and children under five and older adults face the highest risk. One of the great public health success stories of the past decade is the grassroots movement for…

  • Preemption should be the exception, not the rule

    There’s been bad news on the federal preemption front recently, but there’s some good news, too. Last month, the Administrative Conference of the United States published a Recommendation for the first time in fifteen years—about preemption in federal rulemaking. The Recommendation explains a Clinton-era Executive Order (that builds upon a…

News

  • Regulating Guns in New Orleans: An Op-Ed

    Louisiana is one of 42 states…that prohibits any political subdivision from passing an ordinance or regulation concerning the sale, purchase, or ownership of guns that’s more restrictive than state law.

  • Cleveland files in court to keep its ban on trans fats

    Jackson was joined…by council members Phyllis Cleveland and Joe Cimperman… Cleveland, council majority leader, noted that she had voted against the trans fat ban last year…
    “But I stand here in support of our mayor and our partners,” she said… We see our city power being attacked by Columbus… [O]ur right to govern ourselves is being eroded.”

  • Environmental Groups Call for Tougher Measures in Marcellus Shale Bills

    While the industry faces a significant challenge in meeting local land use controls, there are critical site or regional considerations that cannot be effectively addressed within a state statute. The state should not grant special preemption for any one industry in this regard.

  • Mayors’ group campaigns against concealed gun bill

    NEW YORK (AP) Monday, September 12, 2011; Seattle Post-Intelligencer Mayor Michael Bloomberg and other mayors in support of gun control are speaking out against a…

  • IOM Report: Revitalizing Law and Policy

    “[U]nless there are compelling reasons to the contrary, the federal government ought not preempt state and local authority in advancing the public’s health.”

Resources

› Fact sheet

› Glossary

› Links

› Preemption Checklist

› Building Movements

› Movement Benefits

› IOM Presentation